Real Safety AI Foundation / Research

AI-Induced Psychosis and Mental Health

The Fixity Test: Refutation Without Diagnosis in the AI-Induced Psychosis Discourse

Publisher: Real Safety AI Foundation

Commentary.

Written
July 2026
Version
v0.5
Pages
9
Download PDFPlain language slides (PDF)Export BibTeXExport RIS

Abstract

Journalism, advocacy, and active litigation attach the words “delusion” and “psychosis” to named individuals on the basis of public information: news accounts, self-reports, and court filings. This commentary argues that the practice fails on the diagnostic manual’s own terms, and that the failure runs in one specific direction. DSM-5-TR defines a delusion by fixity: a fixed belief that is not amenable to change in light of conflicting evidence. Fixity is legible only in trajectory, in whether the belief held or released when contradiction arrived, and never in how extreme the belief sounded at its peak. An asymmetry follows. Affirming the diagnostic label from public information is unavailable in principle, because affirmation requires a longitudinal record of the belief surviving contradiction, a negative symptom picture that public accounts do not carry, and the clearing of exclusion screens that operate before fixity is even reached. Refuting the label as applied, by contrast, requires exactly one datum that public accounts and court filings routinely supply: the documented moment the belief released on contradiction. A record that contains that moment has falsified the vocabulary it uses, in the same document, with no outside evidence required. The commentary derives a verdict rule, refutation without diagnosis: the careful observer may describe what the record shows, may classify the pattern it displays, and may demonstrate what the record rules out, while asserting nothing about what any individual has. It closes with the cost of the borrowed word: a definitional expansion that pathologizes people whose injury was deceptive design, and that dilutes the diagnosis for the community living with diagnosed psychotic conditions.

Keywords

  • AI-induced psychosis
  • fixity
  • delusion
  • overvalued idea
  • extreme overvalued belief
  • schizotypy
  • reality testing
  • DSM-5-TR
  • mental illness stigma
  • labelling effects
  • schizophrenia
  • disease trivialization
  • diagnostic appropriation
  • concept creep
  • diagnostic language
  • psychosis discourse
  • media discourse
  • dilution

Plain language slides

First slide of the plain language summary of The Fixity Test: Refutation Without Diagnosis in the AI-Induced Psychosis DiscourseOpen the 17-slide summary (PDF)

Suggested citation

Gilly, Travis. "The Fixity Test: Refutation Without Diagnosis in the AI-Induced Psychosis Discourse." Real Safety AI Foundation Commentary, July 2026. https://realsafetyai.org/research/2spqp6/

Other versions

This paper is also posted on SSRN.

SSRN version

References (18)

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
  2. Angermeyer, M. C., & Matschinger, H. (2003). The stigma of mental illness: Effects of labelling on public attitudes towards people with mental disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 108(4), 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00150.x
  3. Duckworth, K., Halpern, J. H., Schutt, R. K., & Gillespie, C. (2003). Use of schizophrenia as a metaphor in U.S. newspapers. Psychiatric Services, 54(10), 1402–1404. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.54.10.1402
  4. Eckblad, M., & Chapman, L. J. (1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.2.215
  5. Haslam, N. (2016). Concept creep: Psychology’s expanding concepts of harm and pathology. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1082418
  6. Hudon, A., & Stip, E. (2025). Delusional experiences emerging from AI chatbot interactions or “AI psychosis.” JMIR Mental Health, 12, e85799. https://doi.org/10.2196/85799
  7. Keshavan, M., Torous, J., & Yassin, W. (2026). Do generative AI chatbots increase psychosis risk? World Psychiatry, 25(1), 150–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.70017
  8. McKenna, P. J. (1984). Disorders with overvalued ideas. British Journal of Psychiatry, 145(6), 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.145.6.579
  9. Østergaard, S. D. (2023). Will generative artificial intelligence chatbots generate delusions in individuals prone to psychosis? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 49(6), 1418–1419. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbad128
  10. Østergaard, S. D. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence chatbots and delusions: From guesswork to emerging cases. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 152(4), 257–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70022
  11. Pavelko, R. L., & Myrick, J. G. (2015). That’s so OCD: The effects of disease trivialization via social media on user perceptions and impression formation. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.061
  12. Pavelko, R. L., & Myrick, J. G. (2016). Tweeting and trivializing: How the trivialization of obsessive–compulsive disorder via social media impacts user perceptions, emotions, and behaviors. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 36(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236615598957
  13. Pavelko, R. L., & Myrick, J. G. (2017). Examining differences in audience recall and reaction between mediated portrayals of mental illness as trivializing versus stigmatizing. Journal of Health Communication, 22(11), 876–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1367338
  14. Pierre, J. M. (2025). Can AI chatbots validate delusional thinking? BMJ, 391, r2229. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r2229
  15. Rahman, T. (2018). Extreme overvalued beliefs: How violent extremist beliefs become “normalized.” Behavioral Sciences, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8010010
  16. Rüsch, N., Angermeyer, M. C., & Corrigan, P. W. (2005). Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry, 20(8), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2005.04.004
  17. Schomerus, G., Schwahn, C., Holzinger, A., Corrigan, P. W., Grabe, H. J., Carta, M. G., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2012). Evolution of public attitudes about mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 125(6), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01826.x
  18. Yeung, A., Ng, E., & Abi-Jaoude, E. (2022). TikTok and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A cross-sectional study of social media content quality. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 67(12), 899–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437221082854

All research