Real Safety AI Foundation / Research

Machine Cognition, Consciousness, and Moral Status

The Bee in the Rack: Human Neural Cultures, Commercial Computing, and the Limits of the Size Argument

Publisher: Real Safety AI Foundation

Working paper. Not peer reviewed.

Written
October 2026
Version
v3
Pages
28

DOI: https://doi.org/10.68481/3b5r5g

Download PDFPlain language slides (PDF)Export BibTeXExport RIS

Abstract

Living human neurons, grown from induced pluripotent stem cells on multielectrode arrays, are now rented as a commercial computing service. Cortical Labs operates racks of its CL1 units in Melbourne and, with partners, in Singapore. That moves the debate over artificial consciousness onto ground where its most developed skeptical argument, that silicon is the wrong substrate, cannot be used in its usual form. In an October 2026 broadcast, the company's chief scientific officer said there is no evidence that small groups of cells in a dish have feelings and that the company checks constantly, and a neuroscientist from Imperial College London, interviewed for the same segment, said that the cultures will not become conscious and that computing on a biological substrate is no different from simulating a large artificial intelligence system, so that the same ethical principles apply. Read as resting on neuron count, the company's reasoning fails against its own comparison class: a single unit holds cells on the order of a fruit fly brain's neurons, and the leading account of organoid sentience rejects size as a reason for dismissal. Read as resting on simple organization, it holds for present flat cultures, and only while they stay simple. Human thresholds that might seem to supply a floor are metabolic rates and cannot be converted into neuron counts. On either reading, the prediction that the cultures will not become conscious gives no assurance about the cultures the research program is engineering. The equivalence claim faces a dilemma. If biology matters to consciousness, the skeptic cannot dismiss these cultures with the arguments about material used against silicon and is left with a contested claim about organisms that neither speaker invoked. If it does not, reassurance must rest on an organizational claim no one on camera made, while the operator's research changes that organization. The operator's own laboratory has disclaimed in print the equivalence of status on which the reassurance would depend. The equivalence also omits the people whose cells and genomes are in the dish. The research lines trace to neonatal foreskin tissue distributed for laboratory research, no consent documentation for the commercial product is public, and donor protections written for research may not reach it. The paper makes no finding that the cultures are conscious and proposes no prohibition. It sets out review triggers keyed to organization, one already met by the operator's research, alongside documentation of training signals, provenance disclosure, decommissioning records, measurement research, and regulatory clarification.

Keywords

  • neuroethics
  • moral status
  • biocomputing
  • synthetic biological intelligence
  • sentience candidate
  • brainstem rule
  • brain organoids
  • invertebrate sentience
  • donor consent
  • biological naturalism
  • convergent uncertainty
  • three-directional inconsistency

Plain language slides

First slide of the plain language summary of The Bee in the Rack: Human Neural Cultures, Commercial Computing, and the Limits of the Size ArgumentOpen the 40-slide summary (PDF)

Suggested citation

Gilly, Travis. "The Bee in the Rack: Human Neural Cultures, Commercial Computing, and the Limits of the Size Argument." Real Safety AI Foundation Working Paper, October 2026. https://doi.org/10.68481/3b5r5g

References (61)

  1. 10 News+. (2026, October 4). Scientists are creating the world’s first biological computer in Australia [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Fb2wOCEEz7c
  2. Abu-Bonsrah, K. D., Desouza, C., Chan, H. W., Habibollahi, F., Watmuff, B., Dottori, M., & Kagan, B. (2026). Coordinated tri-inhibition generates human CA1, CA3 and DG neurons and hippocampal astrocytes forming long-lived and electrophysiologically complex cultures (Version 2) [Preprint]. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.21.700748
  3. Animal Sentience Committee. (2026). Animal Sentience Committee: Welfare implications of legislative differences in the definition of animals. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/animal-sentience-committee-impact-of-definitions-of-animals-in-law/animal-sentience-committee-welfare-implications-of-legislative-differences-in-the-definition-of-animals
  4. Animal Welfare Act 2006, c. 45 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/45/section/1
  5. Animal Welfare (Sentience) Act 2022, c. 22 (UK). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/22
  6. ATCC. (n.d.). Primary dermal fibroblast; normal, human, neonatal (PCS-201-010) [Product page]. Retrieved October 4, 2026, from https://www.atcc.org/products/pcs-201-010
  7. Azevedo, F. A. C., Carvalho, L. R. B., Grinberg, L. T., Farfel, J. M., Ferretti, R. E. L., Leite, R. E. P., Jacob Filho, W., Lent, R., & Herculano-Houzel, S. (2009). Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 513(5), 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21974
  8. Balçı, F., Ben Hamed, S., Boraud, T., Bouret, S., Brochier, T., Brun, C., Cohen, J. Y., Coutureau, E., et al. (2023). A response to claims of emergent intelligence and sentience in a dish. Neuron, 111(5), 604–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2023.02.009
  9. Barron, A. B., & Klein, C. (2016). What insects can tell us about the origins of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(18), 4900–4908. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520084113
  10. Bateson, M., Desire, S., Gartside, S. E., & Wright, G. A. (2011). Agitated honeybees exhibit pessimistic cognitive biases. Current Biology, 21(12), 1070–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.017
  11. Bayne, T., Seth, A. K., & Massimini, M. (2020). Are there islands of awareness? Trends in Neurosciences, 43(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2019.11.003
  12. Beskow, L. M. (2016). Lessons from HeLa cells: The ethics and policy of biospecimens. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 17, 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022536
  13. Birch, J. (2024). When is a brain organoid a sentience candidate? (Version 2). Molecular Psychology: Brain, Behavior, and Society, 2, 22. https://doi.org/10.12688/molpsychol.17524.2
  14. Birch, J., & Browning, H. (2021). Neural organoids and the precautionary principle. American Journal of Bioethics, 21(1), 56–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1845858
  15. Birch, J., Burn, C., Schnell, A., Browning, H., & Crump, A. (2021). Review of the evidence of sentience in cephalopod molluscs and decapod crustaceans. LSE Consulting. https://www.lse.ac.uk/News/News-Assets/PDFs/2021/Sentience-in-Cephalopod-Molluscs-and-Decapod-Crustaceans-Final-Report-November-2021.pdf
  16. Block, M. (2006). Firefighter who awoke from coma dies [Radio broadcast transcript]. All Things Considered. NPR. https://www.npr.org/transcripts/5227036
  17. Boers, S. N., van Delden, J. J. M., Clevers, H., & Bredenoord, A. L. (2016). Organoid biobanking: Identifying the ethics. EMBO Reports, 17(7), 938–941. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201642613
  18. Boisseau, R. P., Vogel, D., & Dussutour, A. (2016). Habituation in non-neural organisms: Evidence from slime moulds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283(1829), 20160446. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0446
  19. Buckley, E. (2005, May 2). Severely injured firefighter shows sign of recovery. Buffalo Toronto Public Media. https://www.btpm.org/2005-05-02/severely-injured-firefighter-shows-sign-of-recovery
  20. Cortical Labs. (n.d.-a). CL1. Retrieved October 4, 2026, from https://corticallabs.com/cl1
  21. Cortical Labs. (n.d.-b). The team. Retrieved October 5, 2026, from https://corticallabs.com/team.html
  22. Croxford, J., & Bayne, T. (2024). The case against organoid consciousness. Neuroethics, 17(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-024-09548-3
  23. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. (2025). Animal welfare strategy for England (CP 1474). GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/animal-welfare-strategy-for-england
  24. Dexter, J. P., Prabakaran, S., & Gunawardena, J. (2019). A complex hierarchy of avoidance behaviors in a single-cell eukaryote. Current Biology, 29(24), 4323–4329.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.059
  25. Dorkenwald, S., Matsliah, A., Sterling, A. R., Schlegel, P., Yu, S., McKellar, C. E., et al. (2024). Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain. Nature, 634(8032), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07558-y
  26. Dung, L. (2022). Why the epistemic objection against using sentience as criterion of moral status is flawed. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(6), 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00408-y
  27. Frasnelli, E., Haase, A., Rigosi, E., Anfora, G., Rogers, L. J., & Vallortigara, G. (2014). The bee as a model to investigate brain and behavioural asymmetries. Insects, 5(1), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5010120
  28. Gaillard, M. (2025). Bioengineering ethics for the age of microphysiological systems. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 13, 1497060. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1497060
  29. Giacino, J. T., Ashwal, S., Childs, N., Cranford, R., Jennett, B., Katz, D. I., Kelly, J. P., Rosenberg, J. H., Whyte, J., Zafonte, R. D., & Zasler, N. D. (2002). The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 58(3), 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.58.3.349
  30. Holm, S., & Lewis, J. (2025). Neural organoids: How should we handle the possibility of sentience? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 34(4), 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180126100140
  31. Howard, S. R., Avarguès-Weber, A., Garcia, J. E., Greentree, A. D., & Dyer, A. G. (2019). Achieving arithmetic learning in honeybees and examining how individuals learn. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 12(1), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2019.1678452
  32. Human Biomedical Research Act 2015 (Singapore, 2020 Rev. Ed.). https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/HBRA2015
  33. Human Tissue Act 1982 (Vic) (Austl.). https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/in-force/acts/human-tissue-act-1982/047
  34. Hyun, I., Scharf-Deering, J. C., & Lunshof, J. E. (2020). Ethical issues related to brain organoid research. Brain Research, 1732, 146653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146653
  35. International Society for Stem Cell Research. (2021). ISSCR guidelines for stem cell research and clinical translation (Version 1.0). https://www.isscr.org/guidelines
  36. Kagan, B. J., Baccetti, V., Earp, B. D., Boyd, J. L., Savulescu, J., & Razi, A. (2026). A quantifiable information-processing hierarchy provides a necessary condition for detecting agency [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.03498
  37. Kagan, B. J., Gyngell, C., Lysaght, T., Cole, V. M., Sawai, T., & Savulescu, J. (2023). The technology, opportunities, and challenges of synthetic biological intelligence. Biotechnology Advances, 68, 108233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108233
  38. Kagan, B. J., Kitchen, A. C., Tran, N. T., Habibollahi, F., Khajehnejad, M., Parker, B. J., Bhat, A., Rollo, B., Razi, A., & Friston, K. J. (2022). In vitro neurons learn and exhibit sentience when embodied in a simulated game-world. Neuron, 110(23), 3952–3969.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.001
  39. Kagan, B. J., Razi, A., Bhat, A., Kitchen, A. C., Tran, N. T., Habibollahi, F., Khajehnejad, M., Parker, B. J., Rollo, B., & Friston, K. J. (2023). Scientific communication and the semantics of sentience. Neuron, 111(5), 606–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2023.02.008
  40. Kataoka, M., Gyngell, C., Savulescu, J., & Sawai, T. (2024). The donation of human biological material for brain organoid research: The problems of consciousness and consent. Science and Engineering Ethics, 30(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00471-7
  41. Khang, A. (2026, August 28). Data center at Southeast Asia’s top university runs on living human brain cells, fed sugar every 3 days. VnExpress International. https://e.vnexpress.net/news/news/data-center-at-southeast-asia-s-top-university-runs-on-living-human-brain-cells-fed-sugar-every-3-days-5113403.html
  42. Khuong, T. M., Wang, Q.-P., Manion, J., Oyston, L. J., Lau, M.-T., Towler, H., Lin, Y. Q., & Neely, G. G. (2019). Nerve injury drives a heightened state of vigilance and neuropathic sensitization in Drosophila. Science Advances, 5(7), eaaw4099. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw4099
  43. Lavazza, A., & Massimini, M. (2018). Cerebral organoids: Ethical issues and consciousness assessment. Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(9), 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104555
  44. Loeffler, A., Habibollahi, F., Abu-Bonsrah, K. D., Azadi, A., Desouza, C., Chan, H. W., Nishi, Y., Zhou, J., Doensen, F., Yamamoto, H., Watmuff, B., & Kagan, B. J. (2026). Handwritten digit classification with neural cultures is influenced by neural architecture, network dynamics, and decoding methods [Preprint]. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.10.743829
  45. Lovell-Badge, R., Anthony, E., Barker, R. A., Bubela, T., Brivanlou, A. H., Carpenter, M., Charo, R. A., Clark, A., et al. (2021). ISSCR guidelines for stem cell research and clinical translation: The 2021 update. Stem Cell Reports, 16(6), 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.012
  46. Marvin, S. (2026). Brain in a chip: Biocomputing infrastructure and the limits of urban governance. Urban Geography. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2026.2693292
  47. Milford, S. R., Shaw, D., & Starke, G. (2023). Playing brains: The ethical challenges posed by silicon sentience and hybrid intelligence in DishBrain. Science and Engineering Ethics, 29(6), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00457-x
  48. Min, R. (2026, April 4). Can brain cells run computers? This startup powers data centres using human neurons. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/next/2026/04/04/can-brain-cells-run-computers-this-startup-powers-data-centre-using-human-neurons
  49. Moore v. Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal. 3d 120, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990).
  50. New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness. (2024, April 19). New York University. https://sites.google.com/nyu.edu/nydeclaration/declaration
  51. Nitkin, K. (2016, May 13). The complicated legacy of Henrietta Lacks. Johns Hopkins Medicine. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/articles/2016/05/the-complicated-legacy-of-henrietta-lacks
  52. NUS Medicine. (2026, August 17). NUS Medicine, DayOne and Cortical Labs unveil biological data center prototype in Singapore. National University of Singapore. https://medicine.nus.edu.sg/news/nus-medicine-dayone-and-cortical-labs-unveil-biological-data-center-prototype-in-singapore/
  53. Orvis, J., Albertin, C. B., Shrestha, P., Chen, S., Zheng, M., Rodriguez, C. J., Tallon, L. J., Mahurkar, A., et al. (2022). The evolution of synaptic and cognitive capacity: Insights from the nervous system transcriptome of Aplysia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(28), e2122301119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122301119
  54. Owen, A. M., Coleman, M. R., Boly, M., Davis, M. H., Laureys, S., & Pickard, J. D. (2006). Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science, 313(5792), 1402. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130197
  55. Protection of Human Subjects, 45 C.F.R. pt. 46 (2018). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-A/part-46
  56. Seth, A. K. (2025). Conscious artificial intelligence and biological naturalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 49, e315. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X25000032
  57. Solvi, C., Baciadonna, L., & Chittka, L. (2016). Unexpected rewards induce dopamine-dependent positive emotion-like state changes in bumblebees. Science, 353(6307), 1529–1531. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4454
  58. Stender, J., Mortensen, K. N., Thibaut, A., Darkner, S., Laureys, S., Gjedde, A., & Kupers, R. (2016). The minimal energetic requirement of sustained awareness after brain injury. Current Biology, 26(11), 1494–1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.024
  59. van Till, S. A. L., Maksimova, M. V., van Thiel, G. J. M. W., & Bunnik, E. M. (2023). An assessment of the moral value of neuronal cell models and brain organoids. Molecular Psychology: Brain, Behavior, and Society, 2, 15. https://doi.org/10.12688/molpsychol.17557.1
  60. Voss, H. U., Uluğ, A. M., Dyke, J. P., Watts, R., Kobylarz, E. J., McCandliss, B. D., Heier, L. A., Beattie, B. J., Hamacher, K. A., Vallabhajosula, S., Goldsmith, S. J., Ballon, D., Giacino, J. T., & Schiff, N. D. (2006). Possible axonal regrowth in late recovery from the minimally conscious state. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 116(7), 2005–2011. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI27021
  61. Williams, T. (2026, March 11). This Melbourne data centre runs on human brain cells. Information Age. Australian Computer Society. https://ia.acs.org.au/article/2026/this-melbourne-data-centre-runs-on-human-brain-cells.html

All research