Real Safety AI Foundation / Research

Disability, Accessibility, and Civil Rights

Four True Things: Bounded Assent and Charity Economics in Segregated Special Education

Publisher: Real Safety AI Foundation

Working paper. Not peer reviewed.

Written
September 2026
Version
v1.0
Pages
15
Download PDFExport BibTeXExport RIS

Abstract

Segregated secondary special education programs sometimes give a scheduled period of the school day to a school-based enterprise in which students perform uncompensated service inside the institution, and the proceeds fund an activity for the students themselves. Where such an arrangement exists, the institution tends to describe it in four ways: as a life skill, as an elective the student chose, as something the student enjoys, and as the source of funding for an integrated activity in which the student takes part alongside nondisabled peers. This paper takes each description as true and asks what each is true of. The elective is chosen from a menu on which every option is the same kind of thing, which produces what this paper calls bounded assent: agreement given from within a set of options that were all of one kind, by someone who was never shown that the kind itself was the thing being decided. The enjoyment is real and its object is the door, the release from a room the student otherwise does not leave; enthusiasm produced by the deprivation of ordinary access is read back by the institution as a vocational preference. The life skill is real and the money attached to it is a donation, which places the charity model at the center of an institution that owes the student equality. And the integrated activity, which may be the best thing in the building, is asked by the institution to vouch for the rest of the day, and to be paid for by the segregated students in labor while their nondisabled teammates pay nothing. The paper argues that the four descriptions are one structure seen from four sides, that the structure is invisible to every well-meaning actor inside it, and that nothing in the analysis rests on the motives of any student, disabled or not, who takes part.

Keywords

  • disability studies
  • special education
  • segregation
  • consent
  • self-determination
  • bounded assent
  • school-based enterprise
  • charity model
  • inspiration
  • unified sports
  • transition services
  • social inclusion

Suggested citation

Gilly, Travis. "Four True Things: Bounded Assent and Charity Economics in Segregated Special Education." Real Safety AI Foundation Working Paper, September 2026. https://realsafetyai.org/research/7rpu8s/

References (26)

  1. Bagenstos, S. R. (2009). Law and the contradictions of the disability rights movement. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300124491.001.0001
  2. Bagenstos, S. R. (2012). The past and future of deinstitutionalization litigation. Cardozo Law Review, 34, 1. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2005301
  3. Bagenstos, S. R. (2020a). Disability rights and the discourse of justice. SMU Law Review Forum, 73, 26. https://doi.org/10.25172/slrf.73.1.5
  4. Bagenstos, S. R. (2020b). Taking choice seriously in Olmstead jurisprudence. Journal of Legal Medicine, 40(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2020.1731320
  5. Bigby, C., Anderson, S., & Cameron, N. (2017). Identifying conceptualizations and theories of change embedded in interventions to facilitate community participation for people with intellectual disability: A scoping review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12390
  6. Carter, E. W., Trainor, A. A., & Çakıroğlu, O. (2009). Availability of and access to career development activities for transition-age youth with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809344332
  7. Cease-Cook, J., Fowler, C., & Test, D. W. (2015). Strategies for creating work-based learning experiences in schools for secondary students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(6), 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915580033
  8. Duggan, C., & Linehan, C. (2013). The role of ‘natural supports’ in promoting independent living for people with disabilities; a review of existing literature. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(3), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12040
  9. Fields, C. J., & Demchak, M. (2018). Integrated visual supports in a school-based microenterprise for students with intellectual disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(2), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418769611
  10. Goethals, T., Mortelmans, D., Van den Bulck, H., Van den Heurck, W., & De Schauwer, E. (2020). I am not your metaphor: Frames and counter-frames in the representation of disability. Disability & Society, 37(5), 746–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1836478
  11. Grant-Smith, D., & McDonald, P. (2017). Ubiquitous yet ambiguous: An integrative review of unpaid work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12153
  12. Grue, J. (2016). The problem with inspiration porn: A tentative definition and a provisional critique. Disability & Society, 31(6), 838–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1205473
  13. Holland, K., & Holland, S. K. (2023). Inspirational and worthy of charity: (Mis)representations of disability in sport media. Communication & Sport, 12(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795231170542
  14. McConkey, R., Dowling, S., Hassan, D., & Menke, S. (2012). Promoting social inclusion through Unified Sports for youth with intellectual disabilities: A five-nation study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57(10), 923–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01587.x
  15. Moore, R., & Friedman, M. J. (2017). The role of informed choice in advancing competitive integrated employment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 46(2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.3233/jvr-160860
  16. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan.
  17. Perske, R. (1972). The dignity of risk and the mentally retarded. Mental Retardation, 10(1), 24–27. Reprinted as The dignity of risk in W. Wolfensberger (Ed.), The principle of normalization in human services (pp. 194–200). National Institute on Mental Retardation.
  18. Rooney-Kron, M., & Dymond, S. K. (2021). Teacher perceptions of barriers to providing work-based learning experiences. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 44(4), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143420988492
  19. Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. Routledge.
  20. Taylor, J. P., Avellone, L., & Brooke, V. (2022). The impact of competitive integrated employment on economic, psychological, and physical health outcomes for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(2), 448–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12974
  21. Taylor, J. P., Avellone, L., & Wehman, P. (2022). The efficacy of competitive integrated employment versus segregated employment for persons with disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 58(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.3233/jvr-221225
  22. Wehmeyer, M. L. (1998). Self-determination and individuals with significant disabilities: Examining meanings and misinterpretations. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.23.1.5
  23. Wehmeyer, M. L. (1999). A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/108835769901400107
  24. Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (2000). A national survey of teachers’ promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. The Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246690003400201
  25. Young, S. (2012, July 2). We’re not here for your inspiration. ABC Ramp Up. Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
  26. Zhang, D., Katsiyannis, A., & Zhang, J. (2002). Teacher and parent practice on fostering self-determination of high school students with mild disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/088572880202500205

All research