Real Safety AI Foundation / Research

Disability, Accessibility, and Civil Rights

Barriers Made of Cameras: Extending Equal Access to Public Spaces from Concrete to Surveillance Infrastructure

Publisher: Real Safety AI Foundation

Working paper. Not peer reviewed.

Written
August 2026
Version
v0.7
Pages
20
Download PDFPlain language slides (PDF)Export BibTeXExport RIS

Abstract

Meaningful access to public space, the standard the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to the streets and sidewalks of every American city, is denied by announced mass surveillance to a class of people with psychiatric disabilities, those for whom observation is the clinical content and public space avoidance is the clinical consequence, spanning the paranoia spectrum, posttraumatic stress disorder, social anxiety disorder, and agoraphobia, and the argument for saying so has already been accepted in its physical form. Whaley, Martinis, Pagano, Barthol, Senzer, Williamson, and Blanck (2024) document that more than three decades after the ADA, architectural barriers still deny disabled Americans full and equal access to public spaces, and that the doctrine treating the public right of way as a service, program, or activity of the city is settled. This article extends their argument to a barrier their survey does not reach. The entitlement it extends is older than the statute, the right tenBroek named the right to live in the world, and scholarship has carried that right off the pavement once already, into the internet's virtual spaces; this article carries it into the surveillance layer. A staircase applies to every person identically, and no defendant prevails by defending one on that ground, because the stairs do not cost everyone the same thing, and the people they cost are the people they exclude. Automated license plate reader networks and allied camera systems have the same structure. They are uniform on their face, unequal in what they extract, and, for this class, they dismantle the intervention that makes public space usable at all: across these conditions the treatment is relearning safety by entering feared situations, and an environment that announces continuous organizational observation converts that exercise from disconfirmation into confirmation at the severe end of the paranoia spectrum, installs the trauma cue at every threshold for the hypervigilant, and makes the feared audience actual and archival for those whose disability is fear of scrutiny. The mechanism rests on measured ground: randomized urban exposure worsens the relevant processes in this population, and perceived surveillance measurably suppresses ordinary behavior in the general population. The claim runs on the meaningful access standard of Alexander v.\ Choate rather than on a freestanding disparate impact rule, through the reasonable modification and methods of administration regulations, on the same statutory ground the curb ramp cases secured. Their barriers are made of concrete. These are made of cameras. The statute does not distinguish between the two materials, and neither should the field.

Keywords

  • disability rights
  • disability law
  • meaningful access
  • reasonable modification
  • ADA Title II
  • methods of administration
  • persecutory delusions
  • paranoia spectrum
  • posttraumatic stress disorder
  • social anxiety disorder
  • automated license plate readers
  • reality testing

Plain language slides

First slide of the plain language summary of Barriers Made of Cameras: Extending Equal Access to Public Spaces from Concrete to Surveillance InfrastructureOpen the 32-slide summary (PDF)

Suggested citation

Gilly, Travis. "Barriers Made of Cameras: Extending Equal Access to Public Spaces from Concrete to Surveillance Infrastructure." Real Safety AI Foundation Working Paper, August 2026. https://realsafetyai.org/research/barriers-made-of-cameras/

References (31)

  1. Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287 (1985).
  2. American Civil Liberties Union. (2026). How to fight deployment of Flock and other mass surveillance license plate readers in your community. https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/tracking-alpr-cameras/how-to-fight-deployment-of-flock-and-other-mass-surveillance-license-plate-readers-in-your-community
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
  4. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
  5. Areheart, B. A., & Stein, M. A. (2015). Integrating the Internet. The George Washington Law Review, 83(2), 449–497.
  6. Bagenstos, S. R. (2004). The future of disability law. The Yale Law Journal, 114(1), 1.
  7. Barden v. City of Sacramento, 292 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2002).
  8. Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). Guilford Press.
  9. Cohen v. City of Culver City, 754 F.3d 690 (9th Cir. 2014).
  10. Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C. C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014). Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 58, 10–23.
  11. Culvahouse v. City of LaPorte, 679 F. Supp. 2d 931 (N.D. Ind. 2009).
  12. Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(4), 319–345.
  13. Ellett, L., Freeman, D., & Garety, P. A. (2008). The psychological effect of an urban environment on individuals with persecutory delusions: The Camberwell walk study. Schizophrenia Research, 99(1–3), 77–84.
  14. Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 20–35.
  15. Fox News. (2026). 119,000 Flock license plate cameras track drivers nationwide: Map. https://www.foxnews.com/tech/license-plate-cameras-tracking-drivers-everywhere
  16. Frame v. City of Arlington, 657 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2011) (en banc).
  17. Freeman, D. (2016). Persecutory delusions: A cognitive perspective on understanding and treatment. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(7), 685–692.
  18. Freeman, D., & Garety, P. (2014). Advances in understanding and treating persecutory delusions: A review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49(8), 1179–1189.
  19. Freeman, D., Garety, P. A., Bebbington, P. E., Smith, B., Rollinson, R., Fowler, D., Kuipers, E., Ray, K., & Dunn, G. (2005). Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia in a non-clinical population. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186(5), 427–435.
  20. Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593–602.
  21. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services, 28 C.F.R. § 35.130 (2016).
  22. Penney, J. W. (2022). Understanding chilling effects. Minnesota Law Review, 106, 1451.
  23. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 U.S. 206 (1998).
  24. Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(8), 741–756.
  25. Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794.
  26. Stoycheff, E. (2016). Under surveillance: Examining Facebook’s spiral of silence effects in the wake of NSA Internet monitoring. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(2), 296–311.
  27. tenBroek, J. (1966). The right to live in the world: The disabled in the law of torts. California Law Review, 54(2), 841.
  28. Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509 (2004).
  29. Waller, H., Freeman, D., Jolley, S., Dunn, G., & Garety, P. (2011). Targeting reasoning biases in delusions: A pilot study of the Maudsley Review Training Programme for individuals with persistent, high conviction delusions. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(3), 414–421.
  30. Whaley, B. A., Martinis, J. G., Pagano, G. F., Barthol, S., Senzer, J., Williamson, P. R., & Blanck, P. D. (2024). The Americans with Disabilities Act and equal access to public spaces. Laws, 13(1), 5.
  31. Whittaker, Z. (2026, February 23). Americans are destroying Flock surveillance cameras. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/23/americans-are-destroying-flock-surveillance-cameras

All research