Real Safety AI Foundation / Research

AI-Induced Psychosis and Mental Health

The Four Verbs: Why AI-Induced Psychosis Research Should Frame AI as Vector, Trigger, or Amplifier Rather Than Cause

Publisher: Real Safety AI Foundation

Working paper. Not peer reviewed.

Written
July 2026
Version
v5
Pages
18
Download PDFPlain language slides (PDF)Export BibTeXExport RIS

Abstract

Public discourse, advocacy organizations, and active litigation increasingly frame the relationship between AI chatbots and psychotic episodes as causal: ChatGPT caused psychosis, the chatbot drove the user into delusion, the platform produced the harm. The clinical literature published in peer review, examined across multiple research groups (UCSF, Aarhus, Université de Montréal, UCLA), avoids but-for causal attribution at the level of the individual case, favoring instead four distinct verbs: derivation, induction, triggering, and exacerbation. The verbs are not interchangeable. Each describes a different etiological relationship between AI exposure and psychotic state. None of them is but-for causation. This commentary makes the implicit explicit: it surfaces the four verbs as a methodological instrument, demonstrates that the substance-induced disorders tradition in DSM-5 and ICD-11 already operates on the same structure for chemically analogous conditions (Adderall-induced psychosis, methamphetamine-induced psychosis, corticosteroid-induced psychosis), and argues that the causal framing now dominating public discourse and product liability pleading creates a defense the platforms can win on. Strict liability regimes (Section 504, ADA disparate impact) do not require the causal framing and are weakened by it. Plaintiff strategy that imports causation creates evidentiary burden the clinical literature cannot support. The four verbs are more accurate clinically and stronger legally. Its boundary is the fixity of the belief: where no psychotic state was present, because the belief was an overvalued idea that yielded to counter-evidence rather than a delusion, none of the four verbs applies and no claim arises; where a psychotic state did exist, derivation, induction, triggering, and exacerbation of it are each independently sufficient for liability under regimes that do not require causation. The commentary closes with a brief note on what the public discourse and the active litigation against AI platforms should be saying instead.

Keywords

  • AI-induced psychosis
  • etiological framing
  • component causation
  • fixity
  • overvalued idea
  • substance-induced disorders
  • diathesis-stress model
  • sycophancy
  • disparate impact

Plain language slides

First slide of the plain language summary of The Four Verbs: Why AI-Induced Psychosis Research Should Frame AI as Vector, Trigger, or Amplifier Rather Than CauseOpen the 21-slide summary (PDF)

Suggested citation

Gilly, Travis. "The Four Verbs: Why AI-Induced Psychosis Research Should Frame AI as Vector, Trigger, or Amplifier Rather Than Cause." Real Safety AI Foundation Working Paper, July 2026. https://realsafetyai.org/research/sj355a/

Other versions

This paper is also posted on SSRN.

SSRN version

References (47)

  1. Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287 (1985).
  2. Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001).
  3. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§12181–12189.
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787
  5. Arciniegas, D. B. (2015). Psychosis. Continuum, 21(3), 715–736. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.con.0000466662.89908.e7
  6. Arunogiri, S., Foulds, J. A., McKetin, R., & Lubman, D. I. (2018). A systematic review of risk factors for methamphetamine-associated psychosis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 52(6), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867417748750
  7. Burns, A. V., Nelson, K., Wang, H., Hegarty, E. M., & Cohn, A. B. (2025). “The algorithm is hacked”: Analysis of technology delusions in a modern-day cohort. British Journal of Psychiatry, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10452
  8. Brooks v. OpenAI, Inc., No. 25STCV32386 (Cal. Super. Ct. L.A. Cnty. filed Nov. 6, 2025), coordinated, ChatGPT Product Liability Cases, JCCP No. 5431.
  9. Canessa-Muñoz, S., Yelmo-Cruz, S., & Hamilton-Lopez, A. (2025). Corticosteroid-induced psychosis: A report of two cases and review of the literature. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.81515
  10. Carlbring, P., & Andersson, G. (2025). Commentary: AI psychosis is not a new threat: Lessons from media-induced delusions. Internet Interventions, 42, 100882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2025.100882
  11. Chandra, K., Kleiman-Weiner, M., Ragan-Kelley, J., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2026). Sycophantic chatbots cause delusional spiraling, even in ideal Bayesians. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.19141
  12. Cheng, M., Lee, C., Khadpe, P., Yu, S., Han, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2026). Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence. Science, 391(6792). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aec8352
  13. Dork, J., Dimenstein, E., & Burns, L. (2026). Overvalued ideas: Conceptual analysis and literature review. Behavioral Sciences, 16(5), 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16050708
  14. Dohnány, S., Kurth-Nelson, Z., Spens, E., Luettgau, L., Reid, A., Gabriel, I., Summerfield, C., Shanahan, M., & Nour, M. M. (2025). Technological folie à deux: Feedback loops between AI chatbots and mental illness. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.19218
  15. Crocker v. Runyon, 207 F.3d 314 (6th Cir. 2000).
  16. Doe v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc., 926 F.3d 235 (6th Cir. 2019).
  17. D’Souza, D. C. (2023). Cannabis, cannabinoids and psychosis: A balanced view. World Psychiatry, 22(2), 231–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21075
  18. Eichenberger, A., Thielke, S., & Van Buskirk, A. (2025). A case of bromism influenced by use of artificial intelligence. AIM Clinical Cases, 4, e241260.
  19. Ehlis v. Shire Richwood, Inc., 367 F.3d 1013 (8th Cir. 2004).
  20. Gable, M., & Depry, D. (2015). Sustained corticosteroid-induced mania and psychosis despite cessation. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 50(4), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091217415612735
  21. Hamilton, I. (2017). Cannabis, psychosis and schizophrenia: Unravelling a complex interaction. Addiction, 112(9), 1653–1657. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13826
  22. Hawke, L. D., Sheikhan, N. Y., & Rodak, T. (2024). Lived experience and family engagement in psychiatry research: A scoping review of reviews. Health Expectations, 27(2), e14057. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.14057
  23. Hudon, A., & Stip, E. (2025). Delusional experiences emerging from AI chatbot interactions or “AI psychosis.” JMIR Mental Health, 12, e85799. https://doi.org/10.2196/85799
  24. Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co., 130 F.3d 1287 (8th Cir. 1997).
  25. Johnson, E. C., Hatoum, A. S., Deak, J. D., Polimanti, R., Murray, R. M., Edenberg, H. J., Gelernter, J., Di Forti, M., & Agrawal, A. (2021). The relationship between cannabis and schizophrenia: A genetically informed perspective. Addiction, 116(11), 3227–3234. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15534
  26. Kendler, K. S. (2019). From many to one to many: The search for causes of psychiatric illness. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(10), 1085. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1200
  27. Keshavan, M., Torous, J., & Yassin, W. (2026). Do generative AI chatbots increase psychosis risk? World Psychiatry, 25(1), 150–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.70017
  28. Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc., 482 F.3d 347 (5th Cir. 2007).
  29. Krebs, M.-O., Kebir, O., & Jay, T. M. (2019). Exposure to cannabinoids can lead to persistent cognitive and psychiatric disorders. European Journal of Pain, 23(7), 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1377
  30. Kristinsdottir, K., Freestone, M., & Underwood, A. (2025). Pathological fixation on shared beliefs: A review and bibliometric analysis of extreme, overvalued and delusion-like beliefs. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1715886
  31. Lewis, D. A., & Smith, R. E. (1983). Steroid-induced psychiatric syndromes. Journal of Affective Disorders, 5(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0327(83)90022-8
  32. McKenna, P. J. (1984). Disorders with overvalued ideas. British Journal of Psychiatry, 145(6), 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.145.6.579
  33. McKinnon v. Kwong Wah Restaurant, 83 F.3d 498 (1st Cir. 1996).
  34. McKetin, R., Lubman, D. I., Baker, A. L., Dawe, S., & Ali, R. L. (2013). Dose-related psychotic symptoms in chronic methamphetamine users. JAMA Psychiatry, 70(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.283
  35. Murray, R. M., Quigley, H., Quattrone, D., Englund, A., & Di Forti, M. (2016). Traditional marijuana, high-potency cannabis and synthetic cannabinoids: Increasing risk for psychosis. World Psychiatry, 15(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20341
  36. Olsen, S. G., Reinecke-Tellefsen, C. J., & Østergaard, S. D. (2026). Potentially harmful consequences of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot use among patients with mental illness: Early data from a large psychiatric service system. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 153(4), 301–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70068
  37. Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, 11 F.4th 729 (9th Cir. 2021).
  38. Østergaard, S. D. (2023). Will generative artificial intelligence chatbots generate delusions in individuals prone to psychosis? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 49(6), 1418–1419. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbad128
  39. Østergaard, S. D. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence chatbots and delusions: From guesswork to emerging cases. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 152(4), 257–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70022
  40. Pierre, J. M., Gaeta, B., Raghavan, G., & Sarma, K. V. (2025). “You’re not crazy”: A case of new-onset AI-associated psychosis. Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(10–12), 11–13. PMID 41635747.
  41. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 §504, 29 U.S.C. §794.
  42. Schoeler, T., Petros, N., Di Forti, M., Klamerus, E., Foglia, E., Ajnakina, O., Gayer-Anderson, C., Colizzi, M., Quattrone, D., Behlke, I., Shetty, S., McGuire, P., David, A. S., Murray, R. M., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2016). Association between continued cannabis use and risk of relapse in first-episode psychosis. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(11), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2427
  43. Wakefield v. NLRB, 779 F.2d 1437 (9th Cir. 1986).
  44. Warrington, T. P., & Bostwick, J. M. (2006). Psychiatric adverse effects of corticosteroids. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 81(10), 1361–1367. https://doi.org/10.4065/81.10.1361
  45. World Health Organization. (2019). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th rev.).
  46. Yurkevich, V., & Duffy, C. (2025, September 5). They thought they were making technological breakthroughs. It was an AI-sparked delusion. CNN Business.
  47. Zubin, J., & Spring, B. (1977). Vulnerability: A new view of schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.86.2.103

All research